Star Trek (2009) - Film Review

STAR TREK (2009)Leonard Nimoy's, he makes up for it with a well-timed,
Director: JJ Abramsone-eyebrowed raise. And since we're on the subject
Year: 2009of Spock, Leonard Nimoy hasn't lost a step when it
Review written by: Joe Yangcomes to reprising his most famous role.
Synopsis: It's the 23rd Century. The story focuses onKarl Urban is fun to watch as Doctor McCoy, and
the early days of Captain Kirk, Spock, and thechannels enough of the late DeForest Kelley without
legendary crew of the starship Enterprise. A vengefulgoing overboard. And of course, Simon Pegg's
Romulan starship captain named Nero (Eric Bana)much-anticipated interpretation of the beloved Scotty
threatens the peaceful United Federation of Planets,doesn't disappoint.
and arrives in a giant ship that resembles the Bloomin'Many familiar lines from the original series and movies
Onion appetizer dish from the Outback Steakhouse.are recited, and many other background elements,
Meanwhile, in Riverside, Iowa, James T. Kirk (Chrissuch as tribbles, are referenced. This is sure to bring
Pine) is an unruly but brilliant young man who enlists inback fond memories for fans (and yes, they kept
the Starfleet Academy after a chance encounter withthose '60s styled mini skirts in case you were
Captain Christopher Pike (Bruce Greenwood). On hiswondering).
first day, he befriends a cynical medical officer namedThe action in this Star Trek reboot far surpasses that
Leonard McCoy (Karl Urban), aka "Bones."of the previous six big-screen adventures featuring the
Adhering to his rule-breaking ways at the Academy,original characters, and the special effects/production
Kirk sparks the ire of one of his instructors, who's nonedesign are everything we'd expect out of a big budget
other than a young Commander Spock (Zacharysci-fi flick.
Quinto).And even though director JJ Abrams pays lip service
But an emergency situation occurs near Spock's hometo the technical geekery famous for getting fanboys
planet of Vulcan, and all Starfleet cadets are called intobeaten up at school, here, he pays more attention to
action once a distress signal is received. Captain Pikestuff like having the characters get stuff done (as
assumes command of the fleet's new flagship, theopposed to sitting around a conference table talking
USS Enterprise.about it).
At the helm is Hikaru Sulu (John Cho), and theThe Bad: Eric Bana's Nero isn't that great of a Trek
navigator is a young, talented Russian cadet namedvillain, compared to the likes of, say, Ricardo
Pavel Chekov (Anton Yelchin). But the Enterprise'sMontalban's iconic Khan. Nero's just a grumpy-looking
new communications officer, Uhura (Zoe Saldana),guy who wields menacing objects and makes nasty
offers evidence that they're heading straight into athreats as he sulks around his giant, flying "Bloomin'
trap.Onion." Thankfully, he doesn't take himself too seriously.
Outgunned and outmatched by Nero and his "Bloomin'Although all the characters are given pivotal roles,
Onion," the Romulan presence turns out to be moreUhura, Chekov, and Sulu are a little underused.
than just a hostile action. Somehow, the space/timeFurthermore, the chemistry and camaraderie among
continuum has been disrupted!the crew doesn't gel as nicely as it did during the '60s.
Emotions flare as Kirk and Spock find themselves atAnd finally, the starship Enterprise is a little problematic.
serious odds on how to resolve the situation. Will theNo, I'm not going to complain about how it looks (at
Vulcan science officer's coldly logical approach guideleast they didn't paint flames on it). Rather, in the TV
them through the crisis, or will James T. Kirk's irrational,show and previous films, the Enterprise itself was
unorthodox methods save the day?practically a character. Not only did the crew bond with
As Earth itself becomes a target, Kirk is further helpedeach other, they also bonded with the ship. But here,
by Montgomery Scott (Simon Pegg) an underratedit's sort of just there and not much more than a prop in
engineer, and another unexpected ally who claims tothe background.
have traveled back over a hundred and twenty yearsWho would like this movie: Fans of the original Star
from the future...Trek series, of course, are most likely to enjoy this film
The Good: This re-imagining of the original Star Trekand get the most out of it.
series is an adrenaline-fueled, action-packed adventure.I expect that the religiously obsessed sci-fi geeks will
It's a much-needed, warp-powered kick in the pantsnitpick the questionable science, the time-travel
that the franchise has been waiting for, and is the veryelement, the absence of anyone using the Jeffries
opposite of the slug-paced Star Trek: The MotionTube, and the fact that young Kirk listens to the
Picture (which made the Latin translation of the BookBeastie Boys at one point.
of Leviticus seem exciting by comparison).But on the whole, the goal of the movie isn't meant to
Chris Pine does an excellent job as Captain Kirk, andsee how well JJ Abrams can satisfy a couple of
brings all the familiar cockiness and charisma to thenerds sitting in the front row of the theater. It's
character. He manages to play Captain Kirk, notsupposed to be fun, and (gasp!) accessible to a wider
William Shatner. Zachary Quinto is a dead ringer for aaudience. As pure entertainment, Star Trek succeeds.
young Spock, and although his voice isn't as deep as